lost my Portuguese ID card and passport
Check out some similar questions!
How much does it cost for arussian lady to get visa passport to live in england [ 2 Answers ]
My russian girlfriend wants to come and live with me in england what is the procedure re passport visa medical and how much does it cost and how long to get it sorted
Lost Portuguese Passport. [ 0 Answers ]
My Grandma had made her Portuguese passport in the year 1960, she remembers the month but doesn’t excatly remembers the day, buy fake ids something between 15 25, so somewhere around
15 25 of Dec.1960 was the day she made her Portuguese passport. But she has all her details like Birth Certificate, filltrustid Marriage.
Lost portuguese passport [ 1 Answers ]I am of goan origin and my father is also a goan. My father has applied for the portuguese passport as he is entittled for it, the process is very very slow and time is running out for me and my brother. buy fake ids As per my fathers memory, during portuguese time he had his portuguese passport but he did.
ID cards were a bad idea from the start
The Coalition’s first Bill will be debated in the House of Commons tomorrow and, fittingly, it involves the repeal of a measure that is emblematic of the last Labour government’s time in office: ID cards.
I have lost count of the articles I have written about them since they were first proposed by David Blunkett, the former home secretary, after the September 11 attacks in America in 2001. At the time, Labour claimed support from about 80 per cent of the population for a mandatory scheme that would involve establishing a National Identity Register to carry the personal details of every adult in the land.
For many, as the dust from the collapsed World Trade Centre towers cleared to reveal a changed security landscape, this seemed a small price to pay for improved safety in the face of the terrorist threat. A familiar phrase came to be used to justify the proposal: if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear.
But of course this was never a security measure at all. The Home Office had been trying to establish a register of the population ever since the last ID card was abolished after the Second World War. When he was home secretary in the previous Conservative government in 1994, Michael Howard flirted with the idea but was beaten back.
As Peter Lilley, one of the foremost Cabinet critics of the idea put it: “There is no policy that has been hawked, unsold, around Whitehall for longer than identity cards. It was always brought to us as a solution looking for problems.”
Before al Qaeda came on the scene, these problems for which ID cards were the answer included benefit fraud and under age smoking, drinking, and betting on the National Lottery. There was hardly a peep about international terrorism or illegal immigration because these were not the problems then that they are today.
The September 11 attacks were another opportunity for proponents of ID cards to push their cause. The only problem was that none of the arguments advanced in their favour held any more water than before. To begin with, fake ids there were civil liberties objections, which Labour deemed to have overcome, though on what basis was never fully explained. But it was the practical tests to which ID cards were subjected that proved their undoing. More evidence emerged to show they would do little to reduce crime, nothing to stop suicide bombers, would be useless against illegal immigrants and of doubtful value against fraud.
Labour also muddied the waters about the costs. The figure that was given for their introduction about 500 million a year when they were up and running applied only to the Home Office budget. Since it was envisaged that all public bodies would eventually need ID card readers, the potential cost was far higher, and could have surpassed 10 billion in the long run. Official figures suggesting that they would actually prove financially beneficial, because the scheme would be funded through charges, were fanciful, both financially and politically.
Labour was also happy to frame this debate in terms of carrying the card, which would not be mandatory, when in fact the real issue was the National Identity Register and the information it would contain. As popular backing for ID cards fell away, Labour switched tack entirely and began to argue that whether we liked it or not, the money would have to be spent on introducing state of the art biometric passports, without which we could not get into America.
This was rubbish, too; but it meant the cost of setting up the new system could be hidden behind this apparently unavoidable spending on passports. As a result, the cost of a passport has shot up over the years. In 1995, just before Labour took office, buy fake ids a 10 year adult passport cost 18. That was the year we said farewell to the distinctive, stiff backed, 32 page “Old Blue”, in which details height, eye colour and other distinguishing markings were written out in the best copper plate of officialdom; it was replaced by the flexible, burgundy coloured Euro document, with which we are now all miserably familiar. Today, a basic 10 year passport costs 77.50. A jumbo will cost more, and if you want one in a hurry, you will pay 138.50. You even have to fork out 49 for a baby’s passport or 96 if you’re in a rush when, until recently, you could amend your own to include the offspring for a fiver. So, even though the last rites will be read tomorrow over the ID card, we are still paying the price of this folly when we go to get our new passport, to which the development of the biometrics for the identity system was linked.
Latterly, Mr Blunkett came to the conclusion that the ID card was probably not a good idea after all, and that the passport could act perfectly well as an identity document, as, indeed, it has done since they were first invented. We would all have been saved a lot of time, fake ids money and effort if he had thought of that in the first place.
DHQ alerts on circulation of fake national identity card
DIRECTOR, DEFENCE INFORMATION, COL.
It said that the National Identity Management Commission (NIMC) remained the only agency responsible for registration and issuance of the national identity card.
This is contained in a statement by Col. filltrustid Rabe Abubakar, Acting Director of Defence Information, in Abuja.
According to the statement, the approved national identity card, filltrustid which is a chip based card, has over 18 security features.
It explained that some of the features were not visible to naked eyes, which distinguished the card from any of its kinds and could only be issued by the NIMC.
implication of fake national ID cards in circulation is that Boko Haram terrorists in the North East also used similar method of identification for their members in the past who were nabbed by the military. filltrustid.com
The statement said the alert would assist the security forces to contain infiltration of illegal aliens who may acquire the cards to legalise their migration into the country to support the terrorists.
214 with veterans ID card clears Senate
Department of Veterans Affairs without burdening taxpayers. The House passed the bill last month with 402 representatives backing it and no votes cast against it. Rep. Vern Buchanan, R Fla., introduced the Veterans ID Card Act earlier this year. Buchanan’s bill would ensure all veterans receive ID cards from the VA instead of just those who served 20 years in the armed forces or are seeking medical treatment for service related wounds.
In pushing his bill in recent months, Buchanan has noted veterans are forced to carry DD 214 paperwork, which contains sensitive information including Social Security numbers, and an ID card would be more convenient and would do a better job of keeping their personal information secure.
“A simple, standardized ID card will make life easier for our veterans and serve as a reminder that our brave service men and women deserve all the respect a grateful nation can offer,” Buchanan said on Tuesday.
Buchanan insisted his bill was budget neutral since veterans who opted for the ID card would have a small fee which the VA secretary would examine every five years. Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D Conn., offered anamendment to Buchanan’s bill ensuring all veterans would be elegible for the ID card, sending the billback to the House. Buchanan’s office expects the bill to sail through the House once again and be signed into law by President Barack Obama. Rep. Rep. Corrine Brown, D Fla., the ranking Democrat on the committee. Reps. Reps. Ted Deutch and Alcee Hastings. The bill has also won the backing of veterans groups including AMVETS and Veterans for Common Sense (VCS).
Anthony Hardie, the director of VCS, praised the bill on Tuesday.
“Veterans who have honorably served their country deserve to have a simple, straightforward way to prove their veteran status,” Hardie said. “Veterans for Common Sense supports sensible legislation like Rep. He was sand bagged by the clerks there He finally gave up There was no sympathy , no understanding, just a very COLD atmosphere, which was not Veteran friendly The clerk seemed disinterested in their jobs No bill in Congress is going to change that situation AND it will cost the VA a lot of
to implement any change It is a disappointing situation for veterans who go to VA OPC clinics to get rudimentary care and are NOT serviced The percentage of dissatisfaction can not be tallied because , most veteran are not vocal about their VA benefits or lack of VA benefits BUT , if you hang around a VA OPC , the obvious lack of attention to the job at hand is extraordinarily there in plain sight
I have NOT read all the comments. I have a retired military ID card that has a 10 digit number assigned to it in place of the SSAN. However, wherever I go within the military system they always ask for the SSAN, “Say What”. The article states that between the Senate (Blumenthal) and the House (Buchanan) they keep tossing the stuff back and forth for amendments, etc. It is no wonder that nothing ever gets done in “Congress”, the direct opposite of “Progress” because of all the dilly dallying and changing a word here and a letter there. Despite what someone had said about common sense all I can say is that there is NO COMMON SENSE in either of the Houses of, again, CONGRESS. Remember PRO is for and CON is against.
About time! Scannable Fake IDs I had been carrying copies of my DD 214 in my car glove box along with a copy of my military discharge to use for retail discounts on purchases. I readily found that not all would accept a DD 214 as the person(s) didn understand that it was an official document and wanted to see an actual frame able discharge document which doesn make much sense to me other than being prettier than the DD 214. I attempted to reduce my DD 214 and discharge papers to wallet size and laminate but then the printing was too small and some retailers balked at honoring the discount as they could not read the very small print. I also agree with ray v that as a former service member with an id card you should be able to shop in any px or bx. Do former congressional members benefits continue after they leave office? And, finally let hear it for LOWE who recognize all military veterans past and present for a 10% discount. Some competitors do not consider veterans of past conflicts like WWII, Korea and Vietnam eligible for discounts.
ID Card, for what? The VA is completely political and way under funded. Here is a fact, explain this, I never used my VA medical because I had commercial insurance. I found out I had cancer and more then likely it was service connected so I went to the VA. I had three campaigns during Vietnam with two bronze stars on my DD 214. I am also retired Air Force. I was turned down by the VA because I made to much money. Basicly they thanked me for my service and showed me the door. No one asked me if I had enough money when I was making $78.00 a month, plus $55.00 for combat pay. You can trust the VA if you want to, it is all bull as far as I concerned. By the way my primary care doctor was with the VA and quite because of political bull. They need to fix the Va system before worrying about ID cards.
When I enlisted in the 1967, we were told that if we spent 20 years serving, and retired we could get free medical care for the rest of our life, access to all military bases to us PX and Exchange facilities and receive a portion of our basic pay. Simple contract we serve and receive in return. We gave up control of our lives to the demands of the military at minimum pay. It was a bag of sand, we served and they cut a whole in the bag. By closing military bases our guaranteed access disappeared to use what was promised. Military retired pay upgrades are always tied to something other than a stand along military pay bill and often never gets approved because what it is included in, thus leaving congress with a clear conscience, and let us not forget that when Congress turned all the Exchange facilities from military positions to civilian and required the exchanges to be profit making to pay for these civilian jobs, thus any savings from low prices we were getting disappeared. I for one don not like the idea of a magnetic strip on a card that can be stolen by anyone with the technology to steal my identity. And to have to pay for such a privilege, and that is what they can call it, is morally wrong. That money could easily be found by removing the retirement programs that congress receives, full salary and medical for life after serving only one term, they should be in Social Security, likewise they should be required to travel in coach like we have to do when being transferred or catch a jump seat in a transport plane. Just look at how Nancy Pelosi travels, private military plane, top shelf booze and food and treats the military personnel like crap. The money she spends yearly would more then pay for the id cards, just another source for funding that always escapes the budget axe. If they issue an idea card, I agree they need to return to a unique id number like our old Service Number which I still remember after all these years, the Idea should also include a current photo and have the same protection as driver license are afforded. I try to use the local VA facility but it is extremely lacking in Doctors and services, especially prescription services which I have to call into San Francisco and it takes up to two weeks to receive. If you need something special you have to ride a 7 hour coach ride south and with no radio or TV on board, Scannable Fake IDs they had them but some jackass in San Francisco will not let the drivers use them. Not all of us have access to personal digital entertainment, most of which will not work due to the remoteness of the road. We use to have a private contractor for VA services but the doctors running the facility wanted to retire, we received super service there. So the VA built a new facility with all sorts of promises as to the service that would be offered, most of which never developed. Even now it takes weeks to get an appointment to see someone at the new clinic. One day I was at the new clinic and gave up my follow up appointment for another veteran who was having serious issues, I don know what it was but his wife gave me a hug and was in tears. On that day there was only one nurse practitioner available so I rescheduled which was a month later for the next appointment. This area has a huge number of veterans and retired vets going back to WWI.
DD 214 4 peovides information dor discharge, like I read previously some merit to recieve an ID card due to the nature of discharge. On the other hand some discharges unfortunatey do notqualify because the discharge was dishonorable and are not entitle to recieve benefits. There are various type of discharge;
1. Honorable Discharge means that your performance was good to excellent. Usually retirement personnel or medical by disability are entitle to this type of discharge.
2. Generable discharge means, General discharges are given to service members whose performance is satisfactory but is marked by a considerable departure in duty performance and conduct expected of military members. Reasons for such a characterization of service vary, from medical discharges to misconduct, and are utilized by the unit commander as a means to correct unacceptable behavior prior to initiating discharge action (unless the reason is drug abuse, in which case discharge is mandatory.
A general discharge may preclude a veteran participation in the GI Bill, service on veterans commissions, and other programs for which an honorable discharge is required, but is eligible for VA disability and most other benefits.
3. Other than honorable means An OTH is a form of administrative discharge. This type of discharge represents a departure from the conduct and performance expected of all military members. It can also be given as the result of certain civil hearings. This also means that they are bared for reenlistment. They are eligible for VA and Other Than Honorable recipients are eligible for Montgomery GI Bill benefits if they have completed at least one honorable discharge, but are not excluded from all Post 9/11 GI Bill Benefits.
4. Bad Conduct Discharge, A Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) can only be given by a court martial (either Special or General) as punishment to an enlisted service member. Bad conduct discharges are often preceded by a period of confinement in a military prison. The discharge itself is not executed until completion of both confinement and the appellate review process.
Virtually all veterans benefits are forfeited by a Bad Conduct Discharge; BCD recipients are not eligible for VA disability compensation in accordance with 38 CFR 3.12.
5. Dishonarable discharge, A dishonorable discharge (DD) can only be handed down to an enlisted member by a general court martial. Dishonorable discharges are handed down for what the military considers the most reprehensible conduct.
With this characterization of service, all veterans benefits are lost, regardless of any past honorable service, and this type of discharge is regarded as shameful in the military. In many states a dishonorable discharge is deemed the equivalent of a felony conviction, with attendant loss of civil rights. Additionally, US federal law prohibits ownership of firearms by those who have been dishonorably discharged per the Gun Control Act of 1968.
So all discharge are explain and some can retain thier benefits, others have to forfeit thier benefits. So it is somewhat fallacious to say that every service member can get an ID. Scannable Fake ID
I see it got amended in the Senate, kicked back down to the house to vote on the amendment. Has to be two similar bills to reach the President. Hope it doesn stall in the House. The amendment seemed to rid of the “Honorable” criteria and just changed it by deleting that part of the bill to just.
Liberal MP backs ID card as effective counter
Liberal MP backs ID card as effective counter terrorism toolMARK COLVIN: A Federal Liberal back bencher says Australian police need much more information to help fight terrorists. The member for La Trobe, Jason Wood, is a former senior officer with the Counter Terrorism Coordination Unit.He says Federal Police, and those in every State and Territory, should know about people with “shot firers licences” for using explosives, and their databases should be better linked to keep track of such lists.Mr Wood says terrorists, such as the September 11th hijackers, have often done legitimate training to gain the knowledge they need.He told Louise Yaxley he was also a strong supporter of a national ID card as another weapon against terrorists.JASON WOOD: I’m very much in favour of an identity card, and I suppose it goes back to 17 years in the police force, where one of the worst crimes against a person is when their actual identity is stolen by another person, when another person gets every aspect of their personal details, and, from a drivers’ licence to Medicare cards to whatever else, and then assumes this person’s identity and goes out and commits frauds.LOUISE YAXLEY: To prevent that, would it need the biometric information?JASON WOOD: Yeah, an identity card without having a photo ID with fingerprints and/or biometrics is a waste of time. If you just have a photo on it, as I found in the police force, buy fake ids a number of people from other nationalities look very similar, so it needs to be absolutely bullet proof in regards to the ID contained on it.LOUISE YAXLEY: Do you see it as being effective in stopping terrorism?JASON WOOD: Where it could actually strongly assist is in incidents where you’ve got a terrorist trying to purchase some products of hire a vehicle, they would then be required to produce the Australia card, because I’m sure once it’s used, it’ll be the standard across the country.LOUISE YAXLEY: So you’re suggesting that for it to be effective in that way, it would have to be produced often, such as when someone hires a vehicle?JASON WOOD: As far as I’m concerned, it’s going to be like a driver’s licence we have now, but with less chance of fraud and duplication.I know people get very concerned about privacy, and I do too, but everyone who has a car has a driver’s licence, that’s recorded, video cards, and the same too with an Australian card, the greatest purpose of that is actually to protect Australian citizens, and my response to them ?I would rather stand up and fight for the victims of this world rather than on the other side, where I allow there to be more victims out there through identity fraud, and also more serious crime, for people who have actually used fake IDs to get weapons or whatever else. Good Fake IDs LOUISE YAXLEY: You see some other flaws in the current system. What else needs to change?JASON WOOD: What I’m greatly concerned about is what I call the lack of interoperability between the police databases across this country.For example, as we’ve seen recently, a missing person reported in one State and located in another wouldn’t be matched up on the system, and this is my great concern ?how terrorists use legitimate training courses through their acquired knowledge, such as in September the 11, with pilot training, or purchase products like ammonium nitrate fertiliser, and how they use these legitimate means to gain their skills.Not in one police database across this country would investigators know who has a licence to possess explosives.And to me this is just a fundamental means to fight terrorism, because terrorists are trying to get hold of these explosives, but the last people to know are the investigators who are trying to keep an eye on them.The police databases, those who are charged with the responsibility of protecting people, must have at the tips of their fingers who has explosive licences, also with a new aviation identification card, if an investigator, he’s looking at a person who’s connected to a terrorist organisation, they want to know, right up front, that this person may have an aviation identification card, buy fake ids not after an incident.
Bar codes and magnetic stripes used on California driver’s licenses
High tech driver’s licenses and state issued identification cards for non drivers are part of an expanding technology that allows computers into more areas of everyday life.
Bar codes, long a feature on consumer items to make automated checkout possible, have found an even wider use in keeping track of industrial manufacturing processes. Now, buy fake ids bar codes and magnetic stripes on plastic identification cards are being used more and more to keep track of people as well as products and manufacturing materials.
Like bank credit cards, the California licenses feature holograms that make duplication difficult. Also, they have images of the driver and his signature that are digitized electronic images rather than photographs glued to the document. filltrustid
On the front of the card, the driver’s image appears on the left side if he is an adult and on the right side if he is a minor.
On the back, each plastic license has a magnetic stripe that carries three tracks of information. Track 2 containing the birth date of the license holder, buy fake ids driver’s license number and expiration date is compatible with similar information carried on the backs of credit cards.
Credit Card With Fingerprint Identification
Credit card technology is in a never ending race to stay ahead of criminals intent on racking up fraudulent charges on your account. The simple magnetic swipe that worked for many years is rapidly giving way to chip and PIN technology but even that technology has weak points. Point of sale transactions are beginning to accept alternate technologies to traditional credit cards, such as contactless payments using near field communication (Apple Pay, for example). Will the chip card become obsolete before it becomes dominant?Don count out card insertion technology just yet. MasterCard plans to introduce a variation of the chip carrying credit card that uses fingerprint identification to produce secure point of sale transactions. The card is currently in a trial phase in South Africa, but MasterCard intends to expand testing to Asian and European markets within a few months, targeting a worldwide rollout by the end of 2017.Here how it works: Your fingerprint pattern is encrypted and stored on the card EMV chip using a fingerprint reader embedded in the opposite end of the card. When you insert your card into a chip reader to initiate a transaction, you place your finger over the fingerprint reader portion of the card (which stays outside the merchant chip reader). The chip validates your identity by matching your fingerprint to the stored pattern, allowing the transaction to proceed. The change is simple for merchants, since those that already have a chip reader do not have to invest in a separate fingerprint reader.Theoretically, this biometric card improves security over chip and PIN because a thief may have managed to get your PIN as well as your card and a fingerprint card is certainly more secure than a chip card that requires only a signature. Fake IDs Fingerprint reading devices are not infallible, as they have been breached in several inventive ways on phones but thieves are not likely to take the effort to fool point of sale transactions this way. They are far more likely just to use your card for online transactions. Online transactions bypass the fingerprint process entirely, using other identifying information that may have already been stolen along with your card information (such as passwords and security questions).How can fraudulent online use be prevented? There is a relatively creative approach being tested in several French financial institutions. The “Motion Code” technology contains a simple display embedded in the card signature strip that changes the three digit security code each hour. Your breached credit card number would be useless to online thieves, since the rotating security code would be virtually impossible for any thief to guess.The downside of the Motion Code: a thief that has stolen your physical credit card can use it at will. It also remains to be seen whether the display will remain functional and readable over the life of a credit card, and since the display requires power, whether there will be any battery issues.In short, there is no 100% safe credit card technology. However, most theft takes place through simple means. If you engage in higher risk practices like using simple passwords, not protecting your PIN and identifying/personal information, Good Fake IDs and transmitting your information over unsecured wireless systems, your chances of credit card fraud are greatly increased.Take reasonable steps to protect your physical cards and all information associated with those cards, and take advantage of all protection services that your card issuer provides (such as fraud alerts and notifications of unusual account activity). Check your account activity regularly for any false charges, even small ones thieves may place them before launching a larger scale attack on your account, just to see if you are paying attention. Make it difficult to access and use your card information, and fraudsters are more likely to move on to less challenging targets.Check your credit report periodically to make sure that no fraudulent accounts have been opened in your name. You can check your credit report and your credit score for free within minutes using Credit Manager by MoneyTips.If new credit card and payment technology still makes you nervous, consider the words of Adam Carroll, Founder and Chief Education Officer of National Financial Educators, “Cash is still king, particularly for those that aren disciplined enough to keep their spending at a minimum.” Those funny green rectangles still work in most places, and exclusive use of them may prevent you from racking up excessive debt.If you want more credit, check out MoneyTips list of credit card offers. Best Fake ID websites If you would like to monitor your credit to prevent identity theft and see your credit reports and scores, check out our credit monitoring service.
Immigration reform and a national ID card 3 letters
Re: “Biometric ID card has merit,” April 25 editorial.
Your editorial in favor of the proposed national ID card flippantly brushed aside the most potent objections to the proposal. The ID card proposal is the epitome of ill conceived nanny state “logic,” a measure that, if implemented, would punish every citizen of our country for the illegal actions of a few foreigners. There is no guarantee that a “biometric Social Security card,” as it is now being called, would stop illegal immigration, or even significantly affect it. The proponents and opponents of this measure know this.
A national ID card is simply another means, this time a bipartisan one, of expanding state control over citizens’ lives. It does not deserve serious consideration.
This letter was published in the April 30 edition.
The Post is right on about biometric ID cards. The solution to illegal immigration is not border control. It is employment. With foolproof ID cards, we can, or should, clamp down on employers who hire illegals. In which case, why would illegals come, or stay, here?
This letter was published in the April 30 edition.
Your editorial only touches upon the primary issue with illegal immigration, that of securing the border with Mexico. Only about 600 700 miles of barriers have been completed along the border. Until the entire border is secured, there is no point in delving into other issues with respect to illegal immigration.
Securing the border will require building barriers along the entire border and supplying boots on the ground to monitor the barriers. The idiotic failed electronic system from Boeing was never a solution, but rather a half hearted attempt to circumvent real barriers and the associated personnel to go with them.
Real immigration reform starts with border control.
This letter was published in the April 30 edition.
this is ridiculous!!! and u wonder y we r in the situation were in! these politicians r full of crap!!!!! close the damned border and end the debate! mexico borders to the south do not allow Guatemalans in their country. go ask mexico there policy on their southern borders! freakin Hippocrates and liberals r just so ridiculous. i tell u what, lets just succeed all states to there own government and every state can be a lil country of its own. then libs can just have california and arizona and live with there decisions. see how long u like ur happy lil lib life, ,making all ur lib decisions. read the bill people. dont just spew ur views. read the bill. with ur own eyes. get it?????
I think it would help if the DEA actually concentrated on the Drug Cartels in Mexico rather than local growers in Colorado. I don think a card or a wall is the answer. This is a very complex issue. I was in Tucson recently visiting friends and can understand why some of them are concerned. The crime rate there a huge problem. I counted over 20 speed traps or whatever, on route 10 between Las Cruces and Tucson not to mention the 4 times I had to pass through a boarder patrol station. I did notice most of the boarder presence was in New Mexico. Thievery is huge in Tucson much like in Honolulu. One of my friends had her truck stolen in February, never saw it again. It took the police 3 hours to respond. On the other hand, I can see how Latinos are concerned over racial profiling with the Arizona legislation that just passed. There is also the little dilemma concerning the fact that Americans hire illegals. This is one of the many reasons that they are here. I would also be concerned that if we arrest them and send them back that our economy would falter even more In any case, there has got to be a better solution than racial profiling and even more restrictions on American Citizens such as a nation ID card.
As I read the responses to the letters and the letters themselves, I keep coming back to the same question. Best Fake ID websites The question is: why not put pressure on Mexico to develop their country on free market principles so that their people will stay there and work jobs provided by free enterprise? The second question I have is: why don we use the same stringent immigration laws here that they use there? May I ask one more question? here goes: will someone please explain WHY they are against tougher border enforcement, at any cost?
Immigration reform is attempting to solve a fundamental economic problem supply demand. The biometric social security card addresses the problem fairly. If every legitimate (ie. legal) worker posseses something that proves their legitimacy, and it includes a biometric that is secured by a chip inside so it can be stolen or altered like social security cards and other forms of identity documents are today, than you limit the demand for legitimate workers and reduce the supply of illegal immigrants who can no longer fake their way into being a legitimate worker. All of the arguments that the government is trying to control you and track you are just paranoia. Biometric social security cards are a good idea!
The problem to me is one of probabability of success.1) Physical barriers don really work. The Iron Curtain and the Berlin Wall were notoriusly porous. That was with a short distance of a barrier and with East German guards (Berlin Wall) who took their job very seriously.2) The lure of high wages. Why doesn Mexico develop their economy? Mexico economy is the 11th largest in the world. Some of the industrial areas in the DF or Monterey or other areas are modern and very productive. I have friends who have developed software companies and done well, The problem is that it is just not enough. So men will put themselves at great risk, live outside the law, so that they can earn a few dollars to send home and keep their families from starving. The lure of El Norte is irresistible.3) Immigration and border control laws are for checkpoints. Since only a few illegal immigrants enter through established checkpoints they are moot.4) I don think people are against tougher border enforcement at any cost. I think there is considerable debate on how to do it. That is the problem.
So Bleeth according to your logic, illegal immigration is just dandy because it helps keep YOUR costs down?Here are some nasty facts you CHOOSE to ignore:Where illegal immigrants are taking away jobs from legal workers (citizens or not), the wage base goes down most for the low end wage earners, but it impacts the rest of us as well When low end wage earners have no jobs or no jobs that they can make ends meet on (paying for the necessities of life), need for assistance (public and private goes up) and some who are unable to find work opt to go into crime as well, increasing the need for jails/prisons. Should ICE or even police departments be ignoring that fact? Many legal members of the Hispanic community are as upset about illegal immigration and not because they want to overthrow the status quo they want it easier for their families to be able to join them LEGALLY in a timely fashion and know that those family members will be able to earn a piece of the American pie as well and they hate being lumped in with the illegals. Of course, those members of the Hispanic community have attempted to assimilate and although they may attempt maintain their heritage as those of us who emigrated here from other parts of the world have (or did you think Oktoberfest, St. Patrick Day and Chinese New Year were American celebrations just to name 3), while they may invite us to share that heritage, they don force it down our throats. For instance how long would the legal work force have to get their cards (and at what cost), how long would it take all businesses to reverify all their employees (and at what cost), and what do we do about the senior citizens who may not even have a valid drivers license, born at home in a small community where birth registrations were haphazard (that one was courtesy of the nuns in their 80s who had voted every year but were being denied the right to vote because they didn have state issued id), etc just a few that immediately popped into my head when I first saw the Post column. I don know what the answer to the issue is I just know that being concerned about getting rid of illegal immigrants because it might impact the economy when nobody has bothered to investigate the impact the benefits of getting legal workers fully employed at a living wage appalls me!
Where in my post did I ever mention Illegal immigration is just dandy or I believe it keeps MY costs down by keeping them here? I never said any of that. Perhaps you need to take a few breaths and reread my post. Judging by the tone and sarcasm of your letter you have your panties in a wad over illegals in general. I am simply making points offered from both sides as to the pros and cons of the situation.
Obviously you have never felt the sting of being profiled. I have, more than once, and I not even Latino or black for that matter. Just dark enough to cause a stir. Your problem is that you obviously have never put yourself in someone else shoes and looked at both sides of the issue. I hate to break the news to you but there isn just one group of immigrants that have chosen to not speak the language. My grandmother and her siblings still speak broken English and they been here since WW2. You also felt the need to sarcastically remind me that Oktoberfest, St. Patrick day and the Chinese New year are not American Holidays and how kind of these cultures not to force their celebrations down our throats. A little reactionary today aren we?
My mention of hiring illegals was just that. WE HIRE ILLEGALS TO WORK IN THIS COUNTRY, that is a fact. BTW I don support that. I made statements on these blogs concerning how the destruction of unions have slowly impoverished the middle class. The middle class has seen a decline in wages or at best stagnant wages since the Reagan years. I know my grandfather enjoyed a rather prosperous middle class lifestyle before all this happened. Just before he retired his factory was shut down by a mega corporation and he lost 30 years of pension and at 65 years of age was forced to look for another job.
Now flash forward to today where our debts have become a growth industry for Wall Street. Corporate greed dictates that one has to maximize profit regardless of who is hurt. American industry and jobs were relocated overseas where there are no unions and labor is cheap. This country profits mainly from production of drugs (legal and illegal), weapons for war, finance, agribusiness (PROFITABLE ONLY BECAUSE OF LOW COST IMMIGRANT LABOR) and of course the service industries that for the most part provide only minimum wage jobs. Then there is health care where much of the profit goes to a handful of upper level insurance executives. They work hand in hand with the food industry which feeds the masses cheap, buy fake ids unhealthy, processed food that causes obesity, diabetes and heart disease, which in turn feeds the health care industry. Quiet a nice racket, eh?
Now I know you aren going to like what I about to say but I really do feel empathy for people who have to leave their own country because they fear for their lives or can find work. I don think most immigrants, and I talking about our ancestors as well, would choose to leave their country of origin unless they felt they had absolutely no choice. My own family left Europe because of war and poverty. Might you try for just one second to understand why some (not all) of these people choose to cross a desert to enter this country knowing that their chances of survival are slim. Yes, I know this isn the only scenario but I can only imagine how desperate one has to be to even consider such a move. But as I mentioned in my previous post, it because we hire them. You may also ask yourself if YOU are willing to work as a laborer in a field, construction or perhaps a dishwasher if we all of a sudden send everyone back. Again, this is a question that we all need to ask ourselves because, like it or not, it would impact the economy.
My whole point to this rant is that the solution is not a simple one. We must look at the big picture before we get all a fluster and start creating legislation that could prove to be even more of a problem than then one we already have.
Paranoid people like John Osborn are perpetually afraid of SS toops coming out of the shadows and getting them for whatever reason while supporting legislation (Arizona SB1070) that takes away more of our personal freedoms. What an ID card has to do with a state is beyond comprehension, but if anyone thinks a biometric SS card will give the government more information than they already have, they fooling themselves. What exactly is it they afraid of? If you not breaking any law, you don have to worry if you are breaking a law, you should be caught. We need to mandate and improve and continue to improve E Verify so that combined with the new ID cards it will be virtually impossible for anyone in the country illegally to find employment. Severe employer sanctions need to be enforced. We need to update and improve the guest worker program. And we have to do everything in our power to help the rest of the to improve all phases of manufacturing, industry, and education. It pretty easy to understand that a person living in abject poverty with no hope for improvement will seek relief in the nearest possible location. We never defy human nature, but there are steps we can take to maintain order. I like a piece of that action personally guarantee that it will help.
Thanks for a reasoned and pithy response. Point 1 I understand and agree with somewhat. point 2, I been to Monterey twice and have seen more satellite dishes there than anywhere up here. So, why don those with the ability to succeed help the rest of their own country? I believe its because of corruption at all levels. Point 3, true immigrant come through check points. some of the illegals only want to work here and send money home. I used to fill out money orders at a store in MN for guest workers. Point 4, We wasted too much time passing a health care law that most of the country didn want, was too cumbersome, was passed without bipartisan support and through bribes and kick backs instead of passing several small bills and also spending time on the economy and immigration reform.
What do you mean by suspect? That precisely the point. If I a police officer and I don like the way you look, I can demand to see your papers look suspect to me. Note: no mention is made of race or appearance, simply I, as a police officer, don like the way you look. Now, suppose you forgot your briefcase in your car and it late in the evening and I don like the way you look. I demand your papers, you don have them on you; but, you protest, I left them in my house My house, right behind me. And the officer says, papers, please! You can produce them and it off to the stoneylonesome.
An unlikely scenario? Maybe, maybe not.
I see your point and I raise you one. As long as one realizes that its the and not the race, then I will concede. If you read my anecdote about my WHITE, drug running friend, you will see that appearance can be a reason for stopping someone. A scraggly, Fake ID long haired and bearded back woodsman looking man with a canoe crossing into America from Canada would be a good reason to arrest someone by appearance. Seeing a van over stuffed with people would also be a good reason to stop someone because of appearance. However, I not ready to state unequivocally that police will stop brown skinned citizens for no reason. Are you?
Again, no more relevance between your friend and his problems than before.
You just refuse to face the FACTS, sonny. The Arizona Statute IS centered around but, as has been pointed out even in Arizona, at the time of the signing ceremony IS NOT the Centuries old prescription of PROBABLE CAUSE.
Do you support ID cards
Should there be a national identity card system in the UK?
Tony Blair has promised to listen to concerns about plans to introduce a national ID card scheme after seeing his Commons majority slashed.
At prime minister’s questions, Mr Blair urged critics to recognise that secure ID cards could help tackle crime, terrorism and illegal immigration in the UK.
However, former minister John Denham told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme that he expects the government will have to make major changes to get the bill through.
Do you agree with the government’s ID card proposals? What do you think about the cost?
This debate is now closed. Read a selection of your comments below.
The following comments reflect the balance of opinion we have received so far:
A stealth tax on the law abiding! ID cards will present no major threat to international terrorists or organised crime, as fakes and forgeries will appear within weeks of the first cards being issued. Sorry, the theory is good, but it won’t work in the real world. And the only losers will be the law abiding public. Yet again!
Kevin, Tetbury, Glos
I give 100% support to ID cards as it would cut down on crime and illegal immigration. Also all the information will be on a single card which will be better for everyone.
Martin Williams, Fake IDs S Wales
If there’re going to be compulsory, then it’s paid through general taxation, not individual’s pockets. And if we don’t have to carry them what’s the point?This will be labours poll tax. I will not be forced into paying for one of these cards.
Neil, Wrexham, Wales
It would be useful to have an ID card. I will use it to scrape the frost off my windscreen in the winter. When I think of any other useful purpose for an ID card, I will be back in contact!
Rod Watson, Winchester, Hants
Why will the cost so much they are just a bit of plastic with some data on and will be manufactured by the million. Three pounds would be too much.
Bill Carney, North Lincs
I grew up under apartheid in South Africa. In the mid sixties, the apartheid regime instituted ID cards for whites, myself included. The British will realise, as we did, that within months, Scannable Fake IDs Big Brother has arrived and will stay! Anything the government can do, in this technological age, is easily replicated by many, many others with the will and the drive. Resist ID cards with everything you have or kiss Freedom goodbye, as we did in South Africa.
Jack Bybee, Tucson, AZ. USA
I fully support the introduction of identity cards. I have nothing to hide. As for the cost, the government should subsidise it and offset the cost against a reduction in benefit fraud and crime.
I can’t really see the benefits outweighing the cost to implement the scheme, so why don’t we spend the significant sum of money on improving security and the quality of life for those living in the UK. If security is so high on the agenda, why have the government purged numbers from the armed services when we all admit they are required? There’s a lot more happening than meets the eye and I would love to know what this agenda actually is.
Mackay, Witney, UK
Why should the individual be made to pay for compulsory ID cards? Driving licences and passports are only necessary if you want to drive or travel abroad. filltrustid Having an ID card will be compulsory for existence in this country to pay for that would be just another poll tax.
Anyone want to bet on how long it will take between the first ID card being issued and a reporter from The Sun managing to get a low paid data entry clerk to assist them in producing a fake?.